Direct Messages

Share this post

DO use Wikipedia

citap.substack.com

DO use Wikipedia

and other less-likely search literacy tips

Kathryn Peters
Feb 3
Share this post

DO use Wikipedia

citap.substack.com

In a recent paper for the Library Journal, Francesca Tripodi, joined by Jade Angelique Stevenson, Rachel Slama, and Justin Reich, built and tested search literacy interventions for librarians. The librarians they spoke with argue that improving search engine literacy requires building trusting relationships with patrons. Additionally, Tripodi and her colleagues offer the following search literacy tips for librarians, teachers, and anyone else educating others to combat misinformation:

  • Use Wikipedia as a starting point. People who use Wikipedia find better answers with greater accuracy in less time than people who don’t. 

  • Don’t judge a site based on its URL. Some .com sites are reliable and some .org sites are misleading! In addition, plenty of nonprofits produce untrustworthy information. 

  • Don’t trust website appearance. Attractive websites don’t always mean high quality information; plain websites are sometimes accurate and helpful 

  • Use lateral reading strategies. The best way to check the quality of a website is by leaving that website. Many people verify sources vertically, by reading About pages and checking the links provided by that website. In contrast, best practice is to distrust your own ability to verify quality of the source and see what others are saying about it across websites (i.e., “lateral reading”).  

In addition, this paper provides the following insights for policy makers and technology professionals: 

  • Trust ethnographic research methods. People routinely misreport their search practices, so ethnographic methods provide insight to instructional designers and UX professionals on how the technological affordances and platform design shape information-gathering practices.

  • Consider mobile first. In rural areas where broadband is limited, people increasingly rely on their phones for information. Mobile designs can shape search practices. 

  • Create a budget for training resources. Instructional resources for librarians will pay dividends in the fight against mis/disinformation. 

Read the full piece

Chat GPT in Context

Speaking of Wikipedia… in a panel discussion on “ChatGPT in Context,” both Alice Marwick and Heesoo Jang made comparisons between ChatGPT and Wikipedia to help the audience consider how the tool may be used in academic settings.

Large language models reflect the social biases of the material used to train them—including Wikipedia articles. As one example of how tech platforms uphold bias, Marwick discussed Francesca Tripodi’s finding that biographies of women on Wikipedia are more likely to be nominated for deletion than men’s even where they pass the site’s editorial standards for notability.

And concerns that new technology will facilitate plagiarism or offer students shortcuts to doing original research, Jang compared academic concerns about ChatGPT’s to early reactions to Wikipedia.

Marwick and Jang joined Shashank Srivastava of the computer science department and Chat Bryant from history in a conversation that ranged from a brief history of the Luddite movement to the technical capabilities of how large language models might eventually become capable of “citing” their sources.

Publications and appearances

Tressie McMillan Cottom sat down with Carolina Connection, the student radio program at UNC, to discuss why inclusive scholarship matters.

Alice Marwick’s 2013 book Status Update continues to help explain all manner of attention-seeking behavior, from why George Santos won’t resign to how Nigerian “follow-back” practices on Twitter differ from U.S. microcelebrity expectations.

The likely end of free Twitter API access marks a new milestone in the post-API age for research. Deen Freelon noted that the rollout process “could’ve avoided many broken research pipelines.”

Coming soon

February 10: The spring speaker series continues with a panel on Digital Governance in the Global South, featuring Sareeta Amrute and Chinmayi Arun in conversation with Nanditha Narayanamoorthy. Details and registration.

Share the invitation:

Twitter avatar for @unc_citap
Center for Information, Technology, & Public Life @unc_citap
Next in the CITAP Spring Speaker Series: Digital Cultures & Governance: Perspectives from the Global South Featuring Sareeta Amrute & @chinmayiarun in conversation with @nandithamoorthy 📅 Friday, Feb10 🕚 11am ET 💻 Virtual ✅ Register: citap.unc.edu/event-digital-…
Image
8:45 PM ∙ Jan 26, 2023
13Likes7Retweets

February 14-17: The University of Florida’s Frank gathering, where Francesca Tripodi will be participating alongside other amazing speakers. Event information and registration.

March 9 & 10: The virtual QAnon Research Conference. Event information and registration.

May 30, 2023: Release date for Alice Marwick’s The Private Is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media.

Rest of Web

ICYMI, What Comes After Disinfo is still getting rave reviews:

Twitter avatar for @robyncaplan
Robyn Caplan @robyncaplan
I really can't recommend this series from @unc_citap enough. Based on the ICA pre-conference "What happens after disinformation studies?" (that I will forever have fomo for not attending). Series edited by @alicetiara @shannimcg and Elaine Schnabel
citap.pubpub.orgIntroduction Essay: What Comes After Disinformation StudiesMaybe it’s time for disinformation studies (at least in its current form) to fade away - or become something new
1:52 PM ∙ Feb 3, 2023
18Likes5Retweets
Share this post

DO use Wikipedia

citap.substack.com
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing